EPS 95 Pensioners Latest News Form Kerala High Court: Judgment Dated 10.7.2020 in WP(C).No.13935 OF 2020(N) Necessarily Action to be Initiated Within Six Month

EPS 95 Higher Pension Latest Update Search Below

In this article I am sharing, herewith, copies of the three very recent judgments of Kerala High Court for EPS 95 Pensioners Information as under:

WP(C) no. 13935 of 2020 order dt. 10/7/2020

Copy of order being shared in Pdf,of judgments only one is given below rest two can be download from link given below.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2020 / 19TH ASHADHA, 1942
WP(C).No.13935 OF 2020(N)

PETITIONERS: See In Order Copy from 1 to 10 Link Given Below

RESPONDENTS:

1. 1 EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REPRESENTED BY REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN, NO. 36/655 A, KALOOR, KOCHI 682017.
2. 2 THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EPF ORGANIZATION, SUB  REGIONAL OFFICE, KALOOR, COCHIN 17.
3. 3 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, SHRAM SAKTHI BHAVAN, RAFFI MARG. NEW DELHI 110 001.
4. 4 HMT MACHINE TOOLS LTD., REPRESENTER BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HMT COLONY, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM 683 503.

• BY ADV.SRI.S.PRASANTH, SC
• BY ADV.SRI.SAJI VARGHESE, SC
• ASG. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
• BY ADV.SRI.ARJUN VENUGOPAL,CGC

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to process Ext.P3 series of applications for the benefit of pension under the Employees Provident Fund Act in the light of the judgment of this Court in P.Sasikumar V. Union of India - judgment dated 12.10.2018 in W.P(C).No.13120 of 2015 and connected cases.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Standing counsel for the respondents 1 and 2, the learned Standing counsel for the 4th respondent and the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India for the 3rd respondent.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P3 series of applications filed by the petitioners in the light of the judgment referred above within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioners. The petitioners shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action.

Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE