EPS 95 Higher Pension List See Your Name | EPS 95 Minimum Pension 7500+DA Hike
THIS IS PAST JUDGEMENT GIVEN BY SC SHARED FOR INFORMATION OF ALL PENSIONERS ONLY
Dear EPS 95 Pensioner,
Dear EPS 95 Pensioner,
It is surprising that a land mark judgement delivered by the Supreme Court of India on 01 07 2015, Civil Appeal no. 1123 of 2015 has gone unnoticed and except for a brief letter from Shri S R Sen Gupta to IBA, no other union has taken any steps. The salient features of the judgement:
1. The bench has authoritatively ruled that Pension is a right and the payment of it does not depend upon the discretion of the Government. Pension is governed by rules and a Government Servant coming within those rules is entitled to claim pension.
2. The judgement has recognized that the revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE.
3. The bench has reiterated that on revision the Basic pension cannot be less than 50% of the Basic Pension in the minimum of the Pay Band in the revised scale corresponding to the pre-revised scale.
4. The government CANNOT take a plea of financial burden to deny legitimate dues of the pensioners.
5. The Government SHOULD AVOID unwarranted litigation and not to encourage any litigation for the sake of litigation.
6. When pension is upheld to be a right and NOT A BOUNTY, as a corollary to the averment that revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE, upgradation of pension is also a RIGHT AND NOT A BOUNTY.
THE JUDGEMENT IS BASED ON THE DECISION ON D S NAKARA CASE.
The judgement is very clear and I wonder how no one has noticed the important aspects and why no one has taken up the matter with the Govt. Why no one has reacted to the judgement is surprising and perplexing.
2. The judgement has recognized that the revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE.
3. The bench has reiterated that on revision the Basic pension cannot be less than 50% of the Basic Pension in the minimum of the Pay Band in the revised scale corresponding to the pre-revised scale.
4. The government CANNOT take a plea of financial burden to deny legitimate dues of the pensioners.
5. The Government SHOULD AVOID unwarranted litigation and not to encourage any litigation for the sake of litigation.
6. When pension is upheld to be a right and NOT A BOUNTY, as a corollary to the averment that revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE, upgradation of pension is also a RIGHT AND NOT A BOUNTY.
THE JUDGEMENT IS BASED ON THE DECISION ON D S NAKARA CASE.
The judgement is very clear and I wonder how no one has noticed the important aspects and why no one has taken up the matter with the Govt. Why no one has reacted to the judgement is surprising and perplexing.
Dear Pensioners!
Forward this msg to a minimum of twenty people (non pensioners too as citizens of India) on your contact list; and in turn ask each of them to do likewise.
In next couple of days, most people in India will have this message.
Posts
3 Comments
I presume, what supreme court said about their pension, ie. National Pension Scheme and not about EPF Pension scheme.
ReplyDeleteNo it is for epf 95pensioners only. Even in 14 July 2020 Judgment from Supreme Court to Kerala High Court decision. It's mentioned every one need not appeal to court it's applicable for EPF95 Pensioners. No committee NAC no one is bothered to take higher Pension. Why are they supporting Govt to reduce burden to them for self benefits
ReplyDeleteSUPREME COURTS JUDGMENT SHOULD BE FOLLOWED STRICTLY AND IMPLEMENTED AT THE EARLIEST.
ReplyDelete