Search More Update on Supreme Court Cases Below:
A professional person has an emotional instrument petition against the administrator and therefore the written record of the Supreme Court for allegedly giving discriminatory treatment to potent law companies and litigants whereas listing matters.
Petitioner-in-person Reepak Kansal has urged the Court that pointers and directions area unit required to prevent the written record from "discriminating against normal lawyers." The plea, that is listed for hearing on Gregorian calendar month eighteen before a Bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra, states that a mechanism has to be established in order that litigants don't seem to be "humiliated" which "equal treatment is given to any or all litigants by avoiding choose and opt for Policy as adopted by respondents".
Kansal states that once he filed an instrument petition on April seventeen, the written record had discovered 2 "false defects". This enclosed non-payment of court fees and failure to file annexures. However, Kansal insists that he had already paid the court fee which there have been no annexures within the petition he had filed. The plea states,
"The petitioner was forced to pay a lot of court fee to urge listed his matter. Petitioner had additionally filed application and letter for urgency. The petitioner created many requests to list the matter. however the written record did not register and list the aforementioned instrument petition."
In comparison, Kansal states, Arnab Goswami's plea seeking quashing of the FIRs against him was filed at 8:07 pm and was listed for hearing subsequent day, at intervals one hour.
The plea any states that another petition by him filed on could twelve has nonetheless to be uploaded by the written record. This was followed by another on could nineteen, wherever once more "defects were discovered by the written record." The petitioner has additionally expressed that there's no mechanism for redressal of the complaints "against the fallible officers of the written record UN agency favor some law firms/advocate for reasons best recognize to them."
"There area unit several petitioner/lawyers are suffering by unequal treatment by the written record because of the cases filed by some law firms/influential lawyers area unit right away listed by written record ignoring the cases of normal petitioner/lawyers." - The plea filed in Supreme Court
On these grounds et al., the petitioner has wanted that the Court direct the written record to not offer discriminatory treatment to potent lawyers and litigants once listing matters. it's additionally prayed that the written record be directed to not "point out supernumerary defects" and to refund the surplus court fee demanded.
Kansal had earlier written a letter to the administrator to highlight the "discrimination practiced by the Registry" whereas listing cases, on an equivalent day Goswami's petition was listed.
Posts
0 Comments