EPS 95 Pensioners might be aware that EPFO HQ had got Special Audit conducted in r/o the Settled Pension Revision Cases on Higher salary in compliance of HQ circular dt. 23.3.2017 at the following three Regional Offices:
Search EPS 95 Higher Pension List Below:
- 1. Regional Office, EPFO, Chandigarh
- 2. Regional Office, EPFO, Puducherry
- 3. Regional Office, EPFO, Thiruvananthapuram
In these reports, you won’t find anywhere that the options under Para 11(3) of EPS’95 is required to be submitted only prior to retirement/attaining the age of 58 years i.e. only during service tenure of the pensioner. Further, the Regional Office, EPFO, Thiruvananthapuram has in very clear terms taken a stand in support of non availability of approvals under Para 26(6) at this belated stage.
Parveen Kohli Sir shared with you copies of the three Special Audit Reports (all merged in one Pdf file) alongwith copies of relevant documents for use in future/courts as/when/wherever required for their authenticity/reference in due course.
Since some record based discrepancies particularly reg. options under Para 26(6) of EPF Scheme were wrongly pointed out by the Audit Team in their report concerning RO, Chandigarh in r/o settled cases of Haryana Tourism Corporation, Parveen Kohli Sir takes up the issue with RO, Chandigarh. A copy of that email has also been merged with the Audit Report of R.O. Chandigarh just for information. Parveen Kohli Sir also shared the Chandigarh report information obtained from EPFO Chandigarh which clearly states that “No letter has been sent to Haryana Tourism Corporation, Chandigarh to seek options from the interested members under Para 11(3) of EPS’95”

0 Comments